In John Caldwell’s essay for this
week, he identifies various examples across networks and programs of “stunt”
episodes on television. These stunt episodes exist largely as a means of
creating a televised “event,” designed to spike ratings and therefore justify
charging advertisers higher rates during key months of the year (February, May,
and November). Caldwell—in one of his many enumerations—outlines two aims of
these stunt episodes: to showcase/celebrate TV production culture, and to
further update the relationship between that production culture and its
audience.
Caldwell sees stunting as a practice
in sync with the “made by committee,” pitch-driven program development of
television in that they encourage stylistic hybridization. However, while he is
rather dubious of the causes and effects of pitch-driven programming, I do not
find him quite as critical about stunting. Rather, he identifies stunting as an
effective business model to both attract larger audiences and push the
boundaries of television aesthetics and stylization. His examples range across
genres, from half-hour multi-cams to David E. Kelley soaps to Xena: Warrior Princess.
However, like Amalia talked about in
her post in the Jenkins reading for the week, I am particularly interested in
the way programs are today becoming more and more referential. I do not think
this is fan-dictated, per se, but rather fan-engaged. As an example, shows like
30 Rock, Community, and The Office
(US) built this referentiality into their diegesis. 30 Rock had multiple stunt episodes focused on Queen of Jordan, the reality show within a show starring Tracy’s
wife Angie. This program was parodic of the Real
Housewives franchise on Bravo (Bravo, of course, is owned by NBC, the
network that housed 30 Rock). The Office, in a stealthily gratuitous
example of product placement, built an episode around the Dunder Mifflin employees
taking long breaks to play the game Call of Duty all under the guise of “team
building.” Community, once NBC lost
hope the program would ever gain more than a cult following and let Dan Harmon
off his leash (for a time), essentially became a pop-culture-of-the-week
sitcom, with each episode built around a different media text.
This level of referentiality is,
like I said, a reward for savvy fans, though I am hesitant to give primary
attribution to audiences. Rather, I think these programs are the culmination of
many, many years of stunt episodes that allow showrunners to craft program
concepts around this referentiality.
Good post. The association I have with 30 Rock and stunting would be the live episodes they did a couple of times. It works as stunt by highlighting the liveness TV, but also points to the self-reflexivity of TGS as a live sketch show like SNL. They also had celebrities available for the live version (Matt Damon was in one I believe). I remember that they also did east and west coast versions, but I also remember there being only one version on Netflix when that season hit. I feel like having the other version would be a prized possession for hardcore fans. Do you know if there was ever a way to have both version other than DVR?
ReplyDeleteGreat articulation of Caldwell's view of "stunting." I wonder how related TV’s increasing referentiality is to changing fan and industry viewing habits alike. Especially for a show like 30 Rock, where moments and jokes are detached and repeated endlessly in gifs and clips, I would posit that increased fan and industry awareness of a show’s past and accumulating cultural impact creates an environment where referentiality flourishes. In which case, I’m not sure increased referentiality is the result of intentional industry awareness of fans, but rather a mutual, gradual change in show culture and memory on both the part of the industry and the consumer.
ReplyDelete